Picture by Davidoff Studios/Getty Photographs
As early as 2006, JPMorgan executives had been conscious of Jeffrey Epstein’s funds to his younger victims, and financial institution officers later joked that he was a “sugar daddy” to women, in keeping with a brand new grievance from the U.S. Virgin Islands authorities.
On Wednesday, the lawyer normal for the U.S. Virgin Islands filed an amended and unredacted lawsuit towards JPMorgan, highlighting inner memos concerning the late sex-trafficker’s pursuit of teenagers and one compliance official’s declaration that Epstein “ought to go.”
In 2011, one senior JPMorgan official argued there was “numerous smoke” and “numerous questions” when it got here to the pervy financier, the grievance alleges.
The amended grievance is the most recent salvo in a authorized battle between the financial institution and the Caribbean territory, in addition to a sufferer of Epstein generally known as Jane Doe 1. Over time, in keeping with the swimsuit, JPMorgan brass shared emails and memos about Epstein dealing with prison investigations or civil lawsuits associated to his underage intercourse ring.
Such memos, the submitting provides, targeted on information articles a couple of regulation enforcement investigation into “whether or not a modeling company run by a buddy . . . fed his urge for food for underage international women” and talked about that “Epstein was recognized to fly younger girls from Jap Europe to Palm Seaside the place they’d therapeutic massage him, amongst different providers.”
These new accusations come on the heels of JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon giving an interview to CNN, during which he claimed the monetary big has “a number of the greatest legal professionals on the earth” and compliance consultants who beforehand labored for enforcement divisions of the Division of Justice and Securities and Trade Fee.
Dimon—who will quickly be grilled below oath as a part of the litigation with Doe and the U.S. Virgin Islands—claimed JPMorgan officers “assessment all of these items and make choices on the time based mostly on what they know, as greatest as they know.”
When CNN anchor Poppy Harlow requested whether or not JPMorgan ought to have taken motion in 2008 after Epstein pleaded responsible to soliciting a minor in Florida, Dimon responded, “Hindsight is a superb reward.”
But, in keeping with the amended grievance, JPMorgan knew about Epstein’s proclivities for years and even referenced the younger girls and women in his orbit.
Based on the lawsuit, one JPMorgan doc alluded to the checking account of an “assistant or younger woman he introduced over from Prague (or some place like that).” The grievance alleges this younger girl was Jane Doe 1, who sued JPMorgan in November, claiming the financial institution reaped hundreds of thousands off Epstein’s trafficking scheme.
The interior memo allegedly chronicled Doe’s financial institution expenses “for lingerie and different sexually express materials” in New York, Palm Seaside, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
One other JPMorgan doc “describes media stories referring to the truth that Epstein bought her at age 14,” the grievance states.
“She remained a buyer of JP Morgan,” the lawsuit alleges, “and Epstein paid her greater than $600,000, from his accounts at JP Morgan, together with greater than $165,000 after Epstein’s plea.”
The grievance additionally shares Epstein’s different payouts to his alleged enablers.
One recruiter who was granted immunity through Epstein’s shady non-prosecution settlement in Florida allegedly acquired $728,000 from the financier’s JPMorgan accounts and “just about all of it” was supplied after his 2008 conviction.
Between 1999 and 2002, the submitting provides, Epstein transferred greater than $23 million to his ex-girlfriend and convicted confederate Ghislaine Maxwell.
The grievance says that JPMorgan famous in inner paperwork that Epstein was “alleged to be concerned within the human trafficking of younger women and regulation enforcement can be allegedly investigating his involvement on this exercise.”
JPMorgan officers additionally allegedly famous that Epstein was “an alleged private affiliate” of Jes Staley, who was then the pinnacle of JPMorgan’s non-public financial institution. (As a part of her lawsuit, Jane Doe has accused Staley of sexual assault, an accusation he denies.)
The amended grievance underscores quite a few different cases during which JPMorgan raised questions on Epstein and whether or not he ought to stay a shopper.
In 2008, Mary Erdoes, CEO of the financial institution’s Asset & Wealth Administration division, acquired an e-mail asking if Epstein was at an occasion with a lady known as “Miley Cyrus,” in keeping with the lawsuit. In one other 2010 e-mail trade, Erdoes and Staley allegedly mentioned a federal investigation into Epstein for little one sex-trafficking.
Erdoes, in a current deposition, “admitted” that JPMorgan “was conscious by 2006 that Epstein was accused of paying money to have underage women and younger girls dropped at his residence,” the grievance says. However throughout her testimony, Erdoes stated that JPMorgan solely axed Epstein as a shopper in 2013 after she discovered his withdrawals had been “precise money.”
It’s unclear why the financial institution waited seven years to dump Epstein.
As early as 2006, the submitting alleges, a JPMorgan Fast Response Workforce decided that the shadowy cash supervisor “routinely” made money withdrawals of $40,000 to $80,000 a number of instances a month—transactions that totaled over $750,000 a yr.
And JPMorgan senior executives—together with Staley, Erdoes, Steven Cutler, and Catherine Keating—“met in varied groupings in July and October 2008, January 2011, August 2011, and July 2013” to debate issues about Epstein, the grievance states.
The financial institution’s anti-money laundering division requested to “exit this relationship” with Epstein, the memo allegedly stated, including that it might “have a possible critical affect.”
Different inner emails questioned the identities of Epstein’s shoppers and shared an article exploring whether or not the convicted intercourse offender was working a Ponzi scheme, the grievance says.
At one level in 2011, JPMorgan officers mentioned that Epstein sponsored non-public financial institution accounts and bank cards for a pair of 18-year-old girls who “seem like a part of his internal entourage,” in keeping with the lawsuit.
“One [woman] is talked about in most of the recaps of the escapades as a prepared participant and assistant when internet hosting guests,” a financial institution memo allegedly said.
“She has acquired about 450,000 since opening from Epstein . . . . Each will be put in Palm Seaside throughout 2004, by the use of debit expenses, which was when most allegations had been from . . . . He did pay different women, many fashions no big quantities. Sugar Daddy!”
In a compliance memo, JPMorgan officers additionally identified a “regarding” article a couple of Division of Justice probe into whether or not Epstein introduced underage women to America through the modeling company MC2, which was owned by French mannequin scout Jean-Luc Brunel. (Brunel, a longtime buddy of Epstein and his confederate Ghislaine Maxwell, killed himself in a Paris jail final February whereas awaiting trial on rape expenses.)
The writer of the memo claimed the modeling company was “legit” and that “it could be arduous for us to inform” if “women had been exploited through their contract or association,” the grievance alleges, including that Epstein secured a line of credit score for MC2.
JPMorgan’s inner paperwork made be aware of Epstein’s charitable basis, too, which the financial institution stated donated funds to Palm Seaside police and transferred funds to fashions, and culinary and therapeutic massage colleges and universities “on behalf of fashions/aspiring actresses.”
“His enterprise accounts Fiduciary we noticed no shopper exercise. I do know his greatest shopper, Wexner parted methods when he was convicted,” one inner memo learn. “His [Due Diligence Reports] say he manages a couple of non-public shoppers cash however by no means says who. I want to know if in reality he's managing anybody’s cash at this level or is all of it his cash.”
A JPMorgan memorandum detailed “quite a few articles” about regulation enforcement investigations into Epstein’s molestation of underage women, in addition to a dozen out of court docket settlements stemming from lawsuits filed by his victims, the grievance says.
The amended grievance provides a declare towards JPMorgan for allegedly obstructing the enforcement of the Trafficking Victims Safety Act.
Final month, JPMorgan filed a third-party grievance towards Staley, arguing he needs to be liable ought to Jane Doe and the U.S. Virgin Islands prevail on their claims.
Whereas legal professionals for Staley and Doe contended that Staley ought to be tried individually from the litigation towards JPMorgan, a federal decide denied the request.
“Although not at all times recognized by title, Staley is a key determine within the allegations made within the plaintiff's and co-plaintiff’s complaints, in addition to the only defendant named within the third-party grievance filed by defendant JPMorgan Chase Financial institution,” U.S. District Choose Jed Rakoff wrote in his order on Monday.
Rakoff stated that Staley “and the details regarding him will subsequently be a outstanding focus of the trial of the underlying case” between Doe, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and JPMorgan. “Below these circumstances,” Rakoff dominated, “it could make no sense to sever the case towards Staley.”
The decide additionally indicated that the trial slated for October 2023 wouldn't be rescheduled.