A textual content messaging service selling secure intercourse doesn't stop younger folks from getting sexually transmitted infections (STI), a brand new examine has discovered.
Researchers needed to look at whether or not texting teenagers and younger adults about secure intercourse would cease them from getting additional infections.
However they discovered the Safetxt didn't cut back reinfection charges.
Certainly the group who obtained the texts ended up having barely extra STIs than those that weren't despatched the messages.
Consultants from the London College of Hygiene and Tropical Medication known as for the “rigorous analysis of well being communications interventions”.
Safetxt didn't cut back STIs. Extra reinfections occurred within the intervention group. Our outcomes spotlight the necessity for rigorous analysis of well being communication interventions.The BMJ
Their examine, revealed in The BMJ, examined two teams of greater than 3,100 16 to 24-year-olds who had a earlier an infection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or “non-specific urethritis” – an an infection of the urethra mostly attributable to an STI.
One group didn't obtain the texts, however had a month-to-month textual content checking their postal and e mail addresses had been the identical.
The opposite group had been signed as much as the Safetxt venture which aimed to scale back chlamydia and gonorrhoea reinfection by encouraging individuals to observe their STI therapy correctly, together with
informing companions about their very own an infection, selling condom use, and inspiring individuals to hunt STI testing earlier than unprotected intercourse with a brand new companion.
Individuals receiving dozens of texts on the topic at various intervals.
Texts had been tailor-made to gender and sexual orientation and recipients may ask for extra info on particular matters.
It was hypothesised that Safetxt would cut back the chance of chlamydia and gonorrhoea reinfection.
However researchers discovered 22.2% of those that obtained the Safetxts had been reinfected with chlamydia or gonorrhoea.
This in comparison with 20.3% within the group who didn't obtain the texts.
However after a 12 months, extra individuals who obtained the texts reported utilizing a condom at first sexual encounter with their most up-to-date new companion in contrast with the group who didn't get the texts – 54% in comparison with 49%.
The examine authors wrote: “The Safetxt intervention didn't cut back chlamydia and gonorrhoea reinfections at one 12 months in folks aged 16-24 years.
“Extra reinfections occurred within the Safetxt group.
“The outcomes spotlight the necessity for rigorous analysis of well being communication interventions.”
The authors mentioned the World Well being Organisation (WHO) recommends the usage of digital well being communication for “strengthening well being programs, together with for sexual and reproductive well being”, supplied that privateness and sensitivity considerations might be considered.
However the researchers mentioned: “In gentle of our outcomes, WHO ought to revise its endorsement of digital behaviour change communication for strengthening well being programs, to specify which matters and content material WHO endorses.”
They concluded: “Safetxt didn't cut back STIs.
“Extra reinfections occurred within the intervention group. Our outcomes spotlight the necessity for rigorous analysis of well being communication interventions.
“Future work may consider the impact of interventions selling condom use and STI testing in these in danger however with a prognosis of an STI.
“Additional analysis ought to deal with the best way to cut back the stigma related to STIs to learn wellbeing, therapy, and precautionary behaviours for these with a prognosis of an STI, with out growing the chance of an infection.”