Beloved pseudonymous Bizarre Twitter thinker dril as soon as wrote, “‘im not owned! im not owned!!’, i proceed to insist as i slowly shrink and rework right into a corn cob” [sic]
That tweet, from 2011, spawned the phrase “corn cobbing,” which in web converse means to say victory within the face of apparent, humiliating defeat.
Now, it appears nearly narratively heavy-handed that the social community that enabled dril to grow to be an absurdist people hero among the many extraordinarily on-line set is shriveling underneath the management of Elon Musk, the world’s richest man (for now)—a person who was as soon as hailed as a genius, however definitely isn’t presently appearing like one.
Musk has misplaced greater than half of his workforce via ill-conceived layoffs and inhumane calls for. Advertisers are fleeing. Promoting verified examine marks to any dipshit with $8 and a willingness to supply their bank card data to a web site that has misplaced a good portion of its safety staff has led to chaos and, sometimes, hilarity. (In a twist that should be heartbreaking for the desperate-to-be-funny Musk, he’s not the one liable for the laughs, the nameless hero pretending to be Eli Lilly is.)
A Nov. 21 New York Occasions piece claims that that is simply Elon Doing Elon, working Twitter the identical manner he ran Tesla and SpaceX within the early days. Whereas the reporters categorical a wholesome skepticism that this method will work at an organization as totally different as Twitter, in addition they go away it to the realm of risk that that is all a part of a playbook that has labored earlier than and may match once more.
In the meantime, whereas Musk isn’t saying a lot to the media, he definitely is Tweeting By It, breaking shit and claiming I meant to do this—flipping his L’s round and sticking them collectively, telling us they’ve been W’s all alongside. (Elon, these are clearly L’s. We will see the Scotch tape.)
Let me supply a less complicated rationalization: perhaps Elon Musk isn’t the boy genius he was made out to be, and by no means was. And perhaps his Silicon Valley friends aren’t, both.
Within the final month, tens of hundreds of tech employees have misplaced their jobs—from Meta to Twitter to Amazon and on down—and within the coming weeks, leaders throughout the business have foreshadowed, there shall be extra.
In fact, enlargement and contraction are inevitable whatever the business. However there’s one thing extra occurring with what we’re seeing throughout tech proper now. It feels greater than the mild waving of the Invisible Hand. It seems like a bunch of fellows who have been heralded as geniuses, then made a bunch of dangerous calls, and now actuality is lastly catching as much as them.
In consequence, the individuals who labored for them, who believed in them, are getting harm.
As not too long ago as a month in the past, the prevailing narrative was bullish on Sam Bankman-Fried, the Bahamas-based crypto billionaire boy. At 30, he was the face and mind behind crypto alternate FTX. He had celeb endorsements, Tremendous Bowl commercials, and the cowl of Forbes journal. However between Nov. 8 and 11 of this 12 months, SBF’s web price went from an estimated $10.6 billion to $0 when it was revealed that the corporate had been doing a bunch of issues that corporations that deal with different folks’s cash shouldn't be doing, and the worth of its underlying cryptocurrency had utterly collapsed. Bankman-Fried had been mishandling buyer funds in a fashion much like what American banks have been doing within the runup to the 1929 inventory market crash. Not very genius conduct!
Amazon can even be eliminating 10,000 jobs, after its “worldwide digital” unit misplaced a reported $3 billion throughout the first quarter of this 12 months. This, based on Enterprise Insider, is as a result of its Alexa digital assistant that everyone thought was the way forward for computing 10 years in the past was really not the way forward for computing. Alexa and its affiliated merchandise have been “money-losing pits” for years, dealing with controversies that eroded client confidence in them, from surreptitiously recording conversations once they have been alleged to be turned off to failing to get its customers to buy continuously. Whoops. Perhaps Jeff Bezos ought to have stayed in area.
Fb founder Mark Zuckerberg’s allegedly good thoughts has been laying down some costly stinkers of late. The recently-rebranded Meta (no person calls it Meta until they’re reporters writing about it or merchants shorting its inventory) sank godlike quantities of cash into growing the so-called Metaverse, an immersive digital actuality world that requires a $400 headset to affix and has supplied a persistently buggy and bizarrely legless person expertise.
(Disclosure: I used to be paid to create content material on a Meta platform on a contract foundation between June 2021-October 2022. I used to be not an worker of the corporate nor was I aware of any inner discussions or enterprise.)
However proper across the time that Elon was Eloning-up Twitter, and someone impersonating Sam Bankman-Fried created a plausible pretend itemizing for the blunderkind’s $40 million Bahamanian penthouse, Zuck introduced that 11,000 of his workers have been about to lose their jobs. That’s 13 p.c of his workforce jobless, headed into the vacation season and perhaps a recession.
It reads a bit like an personal aim.
Perhaps if he’d spent fewer assets organising camp within the Uncanny Valley, Fb could be much less of a final stand for the uncle no person desires to speak to at Thanksgiving and extra of a city sq. able to step in and fill the function that Twitter did earlier than it started circling the bathroom bowl. Hindsight is 20-20, until you’re strapped right into a digital actuality headset and may’t see something that’s really occurring round you.
What number of of those tech busts should we dwell via earlier than we cease lending the parable of the genius CEO such ardent credulity? What number of Elizabeth Holmeses? What number of WeWorks? What number of status streaming mini-series primarily based on the collapse of an organization began by a charismatic charlatan should we see nominated for a perfunctory variety of supporting actor Emmys earlier than we be taught our lesson?
Silicon Valley’s bizarre daddy worship of its leaders has at all times been tiresome for these of us whose brains aren’t pickling in its brine. However now we’re seeing the tech business—with its pathological unwillingness to acknowledge the boundaries of its leaders—blow up in a spectacular style, in a fashion that may hurt even those that wouldn’t know Elon if he by accident ran over them along with his “self-driving” Tesla.
The tech business is a china store filled with bulls—each within the sense that with out delusional optimism within the upside potential of each endeavor, the entire place would collapse on itself, and within the sense that lots of its leaders haven't any fucking clue what they’re doing.
We're watching what occurs when a tradition is constructed round believing its leaders’ auto-mythology.
Silicon Valley is just not a superhero incubator. Its leaders usually are not gods. A lot of them aren’t even geniuses. The longer we bear in mind this, the higher we’ll be at stopping historical past from repeating itself once more. And once more. And once more.