High court hears case involving painting stolen by Nazis

David Cassirer, the great-grandson of Lilly Cassirer, poses for a photograph outdoors the Supreme Court docket in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2022. Lilly Cassirer surrendered her household's priceless Camille Pissarro portray to the Nazis in change for protected passage out of Germany throughout the Holocaust. The Supreme Court docket is listening to the case in regards to the stolen art work now within the assortment of a Spanish museum in Madrid.
  • David Cassirer, the great-grandson of Lilly Cassirer, poses for a photo outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2022. Lilly Cassirer surrendered her family's priceless Camille Pissarro painting to the Nazis in exchange for safe passage out of Germany during the Holocaust. The Supreme Court is hearing the case about the stolen artwork now in the collection of a Spanish museum in Madrid.
  • This May 12, 2005 file photo shows an unidentified visitor viewing the Impressionist painting called "Rue St.-Honore, Apres-Midi, Effet de Pluie" painted in 1897 by Camille Pissarro, on display in the Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum in Madrid. Lilly Cassirer surrendered her family's priceless Camille Pissarro painting to the Nazis in exchange for safe passage out of Germany during the Holocaust. The Supreme Court is hearing the case about the stolen artwork now in the collection of a Spanish museum in Madrid.
  • David Cassirer, the great-grandson of Lilly Cassirer, poses for a photo outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2022. Lilly Cassirer surrendered her family's priceless Camille Pissarro painting to the Nazis in exchange for safe passage out of Germany during the Holocaust. The Supreme Court is hearing the case about the stolen artwork now in the collection of a Spanish museum in Madrid.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A California man and a Spanish museum locked in a dispute over a worthwhile impressionist masterpiece stolen by the Nazis ought to be capable to agree on one factor, Justice Stephen Breyer stated Tuesday throughout arguments within the case on the Supreme Court docket.

“Can everybody agree that it is a stunning portray?“ Breyer requested close to the top of an hour of arguments. The portray is a streetscape, now value hundreds of thousands, by French impressionist Camille Pissarro.

The case itself isn't instantly about possession of the portray however about the way to determine the case, which has been occurring since 2005. Decrease courts had sided with the museum.

On the opposite facet is San Diego resident David Cassirer. His great-grandmother Lilly Cassirer Neubauer, a German Jew, at one time owned the Pissarro oil portray. The 1897 piece, whose title interprets to “Rue Saint-Honoré within the Afternoon, Impact of Rain,” is one in every of a sequence of 15 that Pissarro painted of a Paris avenue as seen from his lodge window.

In 1939, to be able to get visas for herself and her husband to depart Germany, Neubauer was compelled to give up the piece to a Nazi artwork appraiser. She was paid about $360, properly beneath the portray’s worth, and the cash went into an account she was blocked from accessing.

The portray modified fingers a variety of instances since then however is now within the assortment of a Spanish museum, the Thyssen-Bornemisza Nationwide Museum in Madrid, which has fought to retain it. It has been stated to be value greater than $30 million.

Decrease courts discovered the museum to be the lawful proprietor of the portray whereas additionally criticizing Spain for not dwelling as much as commitments to return Nazi-looted artwork.

Even when Cassirer wins on the excessive court docket, and he has the backing of the Biden administration, a decrease court docket choice saying Spanish legislation applies within the case could imply he finally loses, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated.

“I imagine the district court docket stated that each California legislation and federal frequent legislation would undertake Spanish legislation. Why is it that we’re right here should you lose beneath each?” she requested Cassirer’s lawyer David Boies. Boies stated a federal appeals court docket didn’t handle the problem of California legislation.

Each Sotomayor and Boies had been taking part remotely, Sotomayor from her workplace — presumably due to coronavirus considerations — and Boies by phone due to a optimistic coronavirus check.

Boies is the third lawyer to argue by telephone due to a optimistic check because the court docket returned to listening to arguments in particular person in October after greater than a 12 months and a half listening to arguments by telephone. The court docket isn't permitting the general public to attend arguments, and arguing attorneys should check unfavorable.

For a few years the Pissarro portray was believed to have been misplaced or destroyed throughout the battle. In 1958 Neubauer reached a financial settlement with the German authorities, however she didn’t quit rights to attempt to pursue the portray if it turned up.

In actual fact, the portray had traveled to the US, the place it spent 25 years within the fingers of various collectors earlier than being bought in 1976 by Baron Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza of Lugano, Switzerland. In 1993, the portray was one in every of 775 works the baron offered to Spain for greater than $300 million. The Thyssen-Bornemisza Nationwide Museum, a renovated palace, homes the gathering.

In 2000, Neubauer’s grandson Claude Cassirer found that the portray was not misplaced however on show within the museum. Spain rejected his makes an attempt to get it again, nevertheless, and he finally sued in the US. Claude Cassirer died in 2010. It’s his son David now preventing for the piece’s return.

The case is David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Assortment Basis, 20-1566.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post